Major Solar PV & Private-Wire Infrastructure Development

Integrated Project Leadership Through Feasibility, Development, Enabling Works & Pre-Construction

Sector: Renewable Energy / Net Zero & Decarbonisation
Client: Undisclosed
Location: Undisclosed
Contract Value: Undisclosed
Asteria International Services: Project Management | Engineering Management | Commercial Management | Construction Management | Project Controls & Risk Management

Project Overview

Asteria International was engaged under a professional services agreement to provide integrated project leadership during the feasibility, development, enabling and pre-construction stages of a major ground-mounted Solar PV and private-wire energy infrastructure programme.

The appointment extended across project and engineering management, commercial and procurement activities, enabling works and contractor management, project controls and risk, health and safety, technical interfaces, constructability and pre-construction development.

The proposed development involved the transformation of a challenging brownfield site into a large-scale renewable-energy asset, together with the development of a private-wire connection between the generation site and an operational healthcare estate.

The programme required considerably more than assessment of the Solar PV installation itself.

Site preparation and enabling works, historic ground conditions, existing services, surveys, access, utilities, environmental considerations, private-wire feasibility, route development, DNO interfaces, existing electrical infrastructure, stakeholder requirements and constructability all needed to be considered as part of the wider project strategy.

Asteria International provided integrated leadership across these activities, coordinating the technical, commercial, programme, construction and risk considerations required to develop the opportunity from concept towards a deliverable infrastructure project.

The Challenge

Large-scale renewable-energy projects can present some of their most significant delivery challenges before major construction begins.

The proposed Solar PV development was located on a complex brownfield site where historic land use introduced additional environmental, ground and construction considerations.

Although the site was no longer considered to be actively producing landfill gas, the presence and integrity of existing ground-protection measures, including membrane systems, still needed to be considered when planning surveys, enabling works and future construction activities.

Existing vegetation and woodland, ground conditions, access requirements, buried services, existing infrastructure, environmental constraints and survey requirements all had to be understood and progressively addressed.

At the same time, a viable means of transferring electricity from the proposed generation site to the operational healthcare estate had to be established.

This required development and evaluation of a substantial private-wire connection involving DNO interfaces, existing electrical infrastructure, buried services, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and utility surveys, route constraints, highways, land interfaces, constructability and stakeholder requirements.

The challenge was therefore to progressively convert an initial renewable-energy opportunity into a technically, commercially and practically deliverable infrastructure project.

Asteria International’s Appointment

Asteria International provided integrated project leadership across feasibility, project development, enabling and pre-construction activities.

Through the Project Manager appointment, Asteria International managed the interfaces between the client, project stakeholders, contractors, specialists and technical teams while maintaining oversight of programme, commercial, risk, procurement, engineering and delivery requirements.

The role included:

  1. Overall project leadership and development coordination
  2. Client interface and stakeholder management
  3. Feasibility and project-development management
  4. Programme development, planning and forecasting
  5. Project reporting and governance
  6. Commercial and contractual management
  7. Procurement and contractor management
  8. Enabling works planning and management
  9. Contractor and specialist supplier management
  10. Private-wire feasibility and option development
  11. Route development and constructability assessment
  12. Project risk and opportunity management
  13. Project controls and development tracking
  14. Health and safety leadership and management
  15. Site access and logistics planning
  16. Survey and investigation management
  17. GPR and existing-services investigation management
  18. DNO and utility interface management
  19. Electrical infrastructure interface management
  20. Environmental, land and site-constraint management
  21. Project deliverables management
  22. Engineering management and technical governance interfaces
  23. Pre-construction planning and development
  24. Construction-readiness considerations

The role required continuous management across the different development workstreams so that decisions made during feasibility, surveys and enabling works remained aligned with the overall project strategy.

Feasibility & Project Development

Front-end development requires uncertainty to be progressively converted into reliable information upon which technical, commercial and investment decisions can be made.

Asteria International coordinated project inputs across site conditions, surveys, enabling requirements, technical interfaces, private-wire development, DNO requirements, existing infrastructure, programme, commercial considerations, constructability and project risk.

Potential constraints were considered in terms of their wider consequences rather than solely within the discipline in which they originated.

Information obtained through site investigations, GPR and utility surveys, route assessments and specialist technical inputs was progressively incorporated into the wider project-development process.

Historic ground conditions and requirements associated with existing ground-protection infrastructure were also considered when assessing future construction activities and project risk.

The purpose of the feasibility process was not simply to establish whether a Solar PV development was technically possible.

It was to understand the conditions, interfaces, constraints and decisions that would determine whether the complete project — including the generation asset, site development and private-wire infrastructure — could be progressed towards practical delivery.

Developing the Site

The proposed renewable-energy development required significant preparation of the existing brownfield site before the main infrastructure could be developed.

Asteria International managed the enabling works necessary to prepare the site for subsequent development, including site clearance and associated preparatory activities.

The presence of existing vegetation and woodland required clearance activities to be planned and managed within the wider programme while recognising environmental, access, health and safety and site-development requirements.

Historic use of the site introduced additional considerations.

Although active landfill-gas production was no longer considered a significant constraint, existing ground-protection infrastructure and membrane systems still needed to be understood and protected when considering intrusive activities and future construction methodologies.

Site preparation also needed to take account of buried services, existing infrastructure, ground conditions and information emerging from surveys and investigations.

Asteria International managed contractors and specialist inputs across these activities while maintaining oversight of programme, logistics, commercial considerations, risk and the requirements of the wider development.

The enabling phase provided an opportunity to identify and address issues that could otherwise have emerged later during construction.

Rather than treating enabling works simply as preliminary construction activity, they were managed as an integral part of developing a viable and constructable project.

Surveys, Existing Services & Site Investigation

Understanding the existing environment was fundamental to developing the project.

Existing-services information alone could not provide sufficient certainty for the development of the private-wire route and associated infrastructure.

Asteria International therefore managed site investigations, Ground Penetrating Radar surveys and associated utility investigations to improve understanding of buried services and physical constraints affecting potential areas of development.

Information emerging from these investigations was considered alongside existing records, site observations, route-development requirements and future construction methodology.

The objective was to progressively reduce uncertainty before significant design, procurement and construction commitments were made.

Where previously unidentified constraints were discovered, their implications could be considered across route selection, engineering, constructability, programme, cost and project risk.

This provided a stronger basis for subsequent project decisions and reduced the potential for avoidable conflicts to emerge during construction.

Private-Wire Feasibility & Route Development

A major element of the project was establishing a viable means of transferring electricity from the proposed Solar PV development to the operational healthcare estate.

Asteria International managed the project activities associated with the feasibility, evaluation and development of the proposed private-wire connection.

This required considerably more than identifying a preferred cable route.

The proposed connection extended beyond the generation site and required detailed consideration of the physical, electrical and stakeholder constraints affecting its potential delivery.

Asteria International managed the assessment of potential routes and interfaces, including:

  • DNO requirements and interfaces with the existing electrical network
  • Existing electrical infrastructure and connection requirements
  • Identification and assessment of existing buried services
  • Ground Penetrating Radar and utility surveys
  • Review of existing-services information
  • Route surveys and physical site investigations
  • Highway and road-crossing interfaces
  • Land, access and third-party constraints
  • Existing structures and infrastructure
  • Cable-routing and installation constraints
  • Construction access and logistics
  • Stakeholder and operational interfaces
  • Constructability of alternative routing options
  • Programme implications
  • Commercial implications
  • Project risk

Existing buried services represented a particularly important consideration.

GPR and associated utility surveys were managed to improve understanding of existing infrastructure along potential sections of the route and identify constraints capable of influencing routing and subsequent construction methodology.

The electrical solution also needed to be considered in the context of the existing network and associated DNO requirements.

These interfaces formed part of the wider feasibility assessment and needed to remain aligned with the proposed generation strategy, site infrastructure and point of connection.

Potential route options were therefore evaluated as multidisciplinary infrastructure solutions rather than simply as electrical cable routes.

Where constraints were identified, their implications for constructability, programme, cost, stakeholder requirements and project risk were considered as part of the overall route-development process.

Through this approach, Asteria International managed development of the private-wire concept from an initial connection requirement towards a more defined and deliverable infrastructure solution.

DNO & Electrical Infrastructure Interfaces

The viability of the generation project depended not only upon the Solar PV installation but also upon the ability to integrate the proposed generation with the wider electrical infrastructure.

Asteria International managed the project interfaces associated with DNO requirements, existing electrical infrastructure and the proposed private-wire connection.

Electrical considerations needed to develop alongside physical route feasibility.

A route that was physically achievable still needed to support the wider electrical strategy, while technical connection requirements could themselves influence infrastructure development, programme and project risk.

These interfaces were therefore considered as part of the overall feasibility and development process rather than as isolated electrical activities.

Maintaining visibility across the Solar PV development, private-wire route, point of connection, existing infrastructure and DNO requirements supported development of a more coordinated project solution.

Engineering Management & Technical Interfaces

The programme required input from multiple technical disciplines associated with renewable generation, electrical infrastructure, site development, existing services and the proposed private-wire connection.

Detailed engineering remained the responsibility of the appropriate specialist engineers and technical organisations.

Asteria International’s responsibility was to manage the engineering and technical interfaces within the wider project, ensuring that technical development remained aligned with programme, commercial, procurement, risk and constructability requirements.

This included maintaining alignment between the Solar PV development, private-wire requirements, existing electrical infrastructure, DNO interfaces, surveys and the physical constraints identified along potential connection routes.

Technical information was considered within the context of the wider project-development strategy so that specialist activities contributed towards a coordinated and deliverable solution rather than developing independently.

Constructability & Pre-Construction Planning

Constructability was considered throughout the development process rather than being deferred until detailed design or construction.

Potential solutions needed to account for how infrastructure could actually be installed within the constraints of the existing environment.

Access, buried services, ground conditions, existing structures, highways, operational interfaces, land constraints, site logistics and construction methodology all had the potential to influence the viability of proposed solutions.

Asteria International incorporated these considerations into feasibility and route development so that project decisions reflected practical delivery requirements.

This was particularly important for the private-wire infrastructure, where a technically viable route could still create significant construction, programme or commercial challenges.

Considering constructability during development allowed these consequences to be understood while alternative solutions remained available.

Commercial & Procurement Management

Commercial considerations formed part of project development throughout the feasibility and pre-construction stages.

Decisions relating to enabling works, contractor engagement, technical solutions, private-wire options, route development and project strategy had potential implications for both capital expenditure and overall project viability.

Asteria International managed commercial and contractual interfaces alongside programme and technical development, ensuring that project decisions considered their wider delivery consequences.

Procurement and contractor activities were managed within the overall development strategy, supporting progression of the project towards an executable solution.

This integrated approach meant that technical options could be considered alongside their potential programme, procurement, construction and commercial implications rather than being assessed solely on engineering criteria.

Programme & Project Controls

Programme management during the development phase focused on the dependencies necessary to move the project towards construction readiness.

Surveys, site preparation, vegetation and woodland clearance, enabling works, technical development, private-wire evaluation, DNO interfaces, procurement activities and stakeholder requirements each influenced the sequence and timing of subsequent decisions.

Asteria International managed these dependencies within the overall programme, identifying emerging constraints and managing the actions required to maintain progress.

Where surveys or investigations identified additional constraints, their potential impact on programme, route development, cost and subsequent construction activities could be considered within the wider project strategy.

Project controls were used not simply to report progress but to support decision-making and provide visibility of the relationship between programme, risk, commercial considerations and project development.

Risk & Opportunity Management

The front end of a major renewable-energy project is where many of the risks that ultimately affect construction performance first become visible.

Site conditions, buried services, access, environmental constraints, existing infrastructure, route selection, DNO requirements, stakeholder interfaces and technical constraints all had the potential to affect project cost, programme and deliverability.

Historic ground conditions and existing ground-protection infrastructure were also incorporated into project risk assessment, recognising the potential implications of intrusive works for existing membrane systems and subsequent construction methodology.

Asteria International maintained oversight of these developing risks and their relationship with the wider project.

GPR surveys, utility investigations and route-development activities formed an important part of reducing uncertainty and improving understanding of the physical constraints affecting the proposed private-wire infrastructure.

This enabled emerging issues to be considered early and allowed mitigation, further investigation or alternative approaches to be incorporated into project planning before major construction commitments were made.

Risk management therefore formed part of the development process rather than simply documenting risks after key decisions had already been taken.

Enabling Works & Construction Management

Although the programme remained within the development and pre-construction phase, physical enabling activities were required to prepare the site and support future development.

Asteria International managed contractors and site activities associated with these works, including site preparation and clearance.

These activities required coordination of contractor access, logistics, health and safety, environmental considerations, programme and interfaces with the wider development strategy.

Managing physical enabling works during the front end also provided valuable information about site conditions and practical delivery constraints.

This allowed lessons from early site activities to feed back into project development and future construction planning.

Construction management at this stage therefore supported the wider objective of improving project readiness before commencement of the principal works.

Health & Safety Leadership

Health and safety remained integral to the development and enabling phases of the programme.

Site clearance, surveys, investigations, contractor activities and preparatory works introduced real construction and operational risks even before the main development phase.

Asteria International provided project and construction leadership across these activities, ensuring that health and safety considerations remained integrated with programme, contractor management, site access and delivery planning.

The development process also provided an opportunity to identify future construction hazards and incorporate their implications into project planning and proposed methodologies.

This approach recognised that effective health and safety management begins during feasibility and development rather than at the start of major construction.

Developing Construction Readiness

The objective of front-end development was ultimately to create the conditions necessary for informed investment decisions and successful future delivery.

Asteria International progressively coordinated the information required to understand the proposed development across site conditions, surveys, existing services, ground constraints, enabling works, electrical infrastructure, private-wire routing, DNO interfaces, engineering, programme, commercial considerations, constructability and project risk.

Each activity reduced uncertainty or provided information necessary for subsequent project decisions.

This allowed the project to develop from a high-level renewable-energy opportunity towards a more defined infrastructure proposition in which the principal delivery constraints and interfaces were increasingly understood.

Construction readiness was therefore not treated as a single milestone.

It was developed progressively through feasibility, investigation, engineering, commercial assessment, enabling works, risk reduction and constructability planning.

Creating a Deliverable Project

The value of integrated project leadership during feasibility and pre-construction is the ability to identify and resolve delivery challenges before they become construction problems.

Through its appointment, Asteria International provided integrated leadership across project development, engineering interfaces, enabling works, private-wire feasibility, route development, DNO and utility interfaces, programme, commercial management, procurement, construction planning, health and safety, project controls and risk.

The programme demonstrates Asteria International’s capability to support major capital projects from the earliest stages of development — taking an opportunity through feasibility, investigation and progressive definition while managing the multidisciplinary interfaces necessary to move it towards delivery.

It also demonstrates the value of integrating technical development, commercial management, programme, risk and constructability from the outset, when there remains the greatest opportunity to influence project cost, programme and delivery performance.

Complex Projects. Controlled Delivery.

Asteria International provides experienced project and programme leadership across the complete capital-project lifecycle, from early feasibility and development through procurement, construction, commissioning and close-out.

Our integrated approach brings together Project Management, Commercial Management, Construction Management, Engineering Management and Project Controls & Risk Management, providing experienced leadership from concept to operation.